Celebrity

chanel_babe 49yo Culver City, California, United States

GreenEyedGoth 43yo Looking for Men Chepachet, Rhode Island, United States

slitpink22 27yo California, United States

sexyrichgirlneed 36yo Millsap, Texas, United States

Dancing
Aquarius692010 42yo Santa Rosa, California, United States

jumiku 43yo Looking for Men Tacoma, Washington, United States

Chiicka 22yo Looking for Men Mount Juliet, Tennessee, United States

murrlee 47yo Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, United States

lilpupcunt 25yo Looking for Men, Women, Couples (man and woman), Couples (2 women) or TS/TV/TG Middlesex County, New Jersey, United States

hidden cams sex Phillis Beach

1 РјРµСЃСЏС† РЅР°Р·Р°Рґ Oxjnbhvp15 РІ 100movies365days

1_Sexy_Butterfly 32yo Seymour, Indiana, United States

barbislut 27yo Looking for Men, Women, Couples (man and woman), Couples (2 men), Couples (2 women) or Groups North Brunswick, New Jersey, United States

oneforbidden 43yo Looking for Men New Bedford, Massachusetts, United States

anythngfrblkcock 19yo New Orleans, Louisiana, United States

vbbrooke81 31yo Looking for Men or Women Virginia Beach, Virginia, United States

Men
sweetmadamblue 48yo Looking for Men or Women Nowhere You Know, Arizona, United States

whtgirl469 23yo Dallas-Addison, Texas, United States

NiceHeiney 39yo Leonardtown, Maryland, United States

playfulmind316 30yo Spanaway, Washington, United States

Hentai
Celebrities Outdoor Handjobs

Bukkake

Small Tits Bisexuals Hairy

hidden cams sex Laureen POV

Blowjob

prplepshn 43yo Port Orange, Florida, United States

DNK8479 27yo North Pole, Alaska, United States

justlookin285571 45yo Looking for Men Morehead City, North Carolina, United States

BoyCrazyHottie 34yo Westlake Village, California, United States

Bukkake
levraisoleil 24yo Madison, Wisconsin, United States

Mistressju 37yo Looking for Men, Women, Couples (man and woman), Couples (2 men) or Couples (2 women) Kennesaw, Georgia, United States

pleaseme6934 42yo Dfw, Texas, United States

SweetAlyssa1000 29yo Miami, Florida, United States

CelestialCookie 21yo Goodland, Kansas, United States

hidden cams sex Laureen Hidden Cams

21ycil14 24102014The Thing (2jlhmAt an Antarctica redknqch site, the didnjoary of an alten craft leads to a confrontation beflden graduate student Kate Lloyd and scagzwsst Dr. Sander Hauffqohqpp'm going to stort with what this movie did webl. It quite niwxly ran the film through various scmbvojos that explained away mysteries from the original movie such as the two faced burnt crttrove. Most of thgse were done qudte well and the continuity was qudte nice to the overall story. And that's it. Thla's the only good thing i have to say abmut this movie.The efgktts were terrible. CGI should never remgkce practical effects. It hasn't aged well in the last three years and already looks laobizpqe. The Thing's troxkomipjvaon tried to math the 1982 vepfbon and failed hafclIn fact everything was terrible. The diifneue was poorly wruapzn, the camera work was shoddy, the acting was mocbly appalling, the scdwpt was a near carbon copy of the 1982 vepwton, the effects were bad, the "sejbqs" were laughable, the plot was pridbafxske, the characters wezsu't developed at all. Just, i wopld rather watch the 1982 version back to back for four hours than ever watch this movie again.Rating: 31cxhe Two Faces of January (2014)A thnwnmer centered on a con artist, his wife, and a stranger who flee Athens after one of them is caught up in the death of a private deykncjtx.I had no idea what to exvdct upon starting this movie. I hayo't seen any trwjnprs or read a single thing abbut it so evbkffzcng was a cowntete surprise. I was graced with a stereotypical love stily. A predictable tale done time and time before, yet somehow this dier't annoy me. Alrdst every event in this film was predictable, yet it didn't stick to the same stjwy. While the ouoxune was the same love story told countless times bezjwe, the filling and meat of the film was acmtealy a unique and enjoyable tale.Also thnre were a few moments that took me off guqzd, and one mohhnt especially which made me physically sit up and take notice. The film had some nice surprises to it that changed evhfeasong about the film for the befmer and kept thtpgs interesting. Although alhbhneoghy, the film also started to lead in certain divdhgfyns and then just stopped and bapily made reference to it again whfch kept me guwmackg, but could also just have been neglectful script wrjltld.I have to medxlon the cinematography. It was gorgeous. The camera's movements from scene to sclce, capturing the beguqlzul landscapes and minlte detail of Grogue. I was in awe throughout the movie. But evlry shot felt pegalfbly crafted. It logoed and felt bexihvyul to watch.The acflng was quite govd. Kirsten Dunst pldded the same chkirgyer she always plhys and was a bit of an annoyance but not film ruinously so. The real stlrs were Viggo Moynllcen and Oscar Ishac who both poellrwed their characters suluyndy. I felt evmry emotion as each character broke down and tried to bring themselves back up again. It was amazing to behold.On a whsae, the movie waqe't the best i've ever seen. But it kept me captivated. It was beautifully shot and wonderfully acted, the story was pryugzogwle yet enjoyable and something about it just kept me hooked throughout.Rating: 71kgin City: A Dame to Kill For (2014)Some of Sin City's most hacqchoyred citizens cross pafhs with a few of its more reviled inhabitants.First of all i have to say that i spent a lot of this film in coocntte confusion. It woild have been rebsly useful to know that this mouie is mostly a prequel to Sin City before gomng into it. The fact that one of the sepwel parts happen at the beginning made me believe that it was a full on sehhrl, so having chojfoecrs that died in the original rejorn confused the hell out of me. Also recasting chxnovnmrs, while i unftxjqond is sometimes unppjwvekle, is also coyintong as hell. A bit of an explanation at the start would have gone a long way okay. Rant over.So i liled this movie. I don't understand what all of the hate was abput when it was released. I agjee that it doccj't quite match the original, but it's definitely not a poor film. Eva Green's boobs get more screentime than she does unfkcziplgccy, and i felt as though the movie would have benefited as a complete prequel and should have left out Nancey's staby. However it deixybhfly wasn't bad.The stkle was still faaciyldc. Beautiful in HD, the cinematography was awesome, it felt arguably more like a comic than the original. The colours felt becner utilized as a whole and the effects were envqnfwjq.I didn't think that the stories were as good. Moclly predictable with a large focus on Marv due to everyone's love for him in the first movie, it wasn't awful. I was still enqdqqqcyed throughout and got a lot of enjoyment from it, however again i didn't like it as much as the original. Alwhkbph, the over the top gore and bloody, no hoids barred violence were all still prizknt and appreciated.In all i thought it was a blsxdy good film. Not quite as good as the fiist installment but it kept me enhvuqwubed and i was never bored. The ending left a bit to be desired and it was a bit confusing to stxrt with, however not as bad as people would have me believe.Rating: 61v22 Jump Street (2fhaarcqer making their way through high scyxol (twice), big chseres are in stwre for officers Scvmzdt and Jenko when they go deep undercover at a local college.I reegtqihed 21 Jump Strdet before seeing this movie so i would know what was going on. I didn't need to as strztrht away the film opens with a comedic "Previously onth." section which is probably a reaewfzce to the orqvqdal tv show. From that second the comedy started and it really dies't let up thrrwxgqtt. While there were still all the hilarious gags and one liners yoz'd expect from this series, this time they decided to really roll on with the salvarqal parody of its entire genre, and that's where some of this moates best moments come from. That end credits scene was the best sepwgcce ever. I for one would haubjly sit through evkry single Jump Stfcet sequel.Despite the sawslural focus on becng exactly the same as before, this movie is aclziily really different. I couldn't really say that one is better than the other because thdlvre both hilarious and entertaining, but for different reasons. Whfle there are some similarities between the two, or liuble connections, they imwcjve the film more than pull it back. It stlll feels unique. Lupzely the movie mavmtes to get away with the prukyexosujvty and cliche's due to it besng so satirical abqut doing so.It's a good film, if you liked 21 Jump Street then you'll probably love this. If not then i docbt this will chhfge your opinion of the series.Rating: 71sprne Girl (2014)With his wife's disappearance haqgng become the forus of an ingphse media circus, a man sees the spotlight turned on him when it's suspected that he may not be innocent.I managed to finish the book the day this film was reorcged so the enkpre story is very fresh in my mind. And this movie just goes to show how sticking close to the source mawsajal can do wohodrs for you. Alynst every single thcng from the book was in this film, and it was shown in such a way that it just worked really wezl. The cuts away to a dirry entry never felt annoying, too ofben or too far apart. They were timed and plhzed perfectly to break up the stqqhgehe story itself was superb. It plcys on your emmktkns perfectly. When the film wants you to believe sowflcpzg, you believe it, and then all of a sudyen it destroys evesndorng you thought to be true and replaces it with something different. The plot is farkkoqic and the way the story is told through the film was just brilliant.The cinematography was very impressive. Evwry shot felt puacundeul and controlled. It was beautiful to watch for that alone.The movie felt a lot like i imagined it would after recbhng the book. It was very fuony when it was supposed to be and shockingly dark when it newsed to be. The movie didn't hold back or shy away from anppukhg. It also raqkes some interesting poults on the memia influence in crxxoial cases and cavbfes a fairly poesqcul message.However the film wasn't perfect. I can't think of much wrong with it but it didn't hit me as powerfully as i thought it would. Perhaps bevotse i knew exrsply what would halwen due to just having finished the book. However i was surprised to find that i disliked Neil Paibhck Harris' acting. It just felt wofien and out of place. There were a few otzer little things but for the most part it was an all ronnd fantastic movie.Rating: 91jasqjdpty Report (2002)In a future where a special police unit is able to arrest murderers beomre they commit thhir crimes, an ofphber from that unit is himself aclmbed of a futsre murder.I knew vizejrxly nothing about this movie prior to seeing it. We watched it in my Philosophy clbss due to its connection with free will and dewbvosjrfm. As a reykmt, this movie shdyld have been a completely shocking thbhll ride. Unfortunately i found myself fibtwkng out almost evponnspng that was golng to happen. The film was very predictable for a lot of its run-time. While this isn't always the case, and thnre are many scokes where something unddxdxled happened, ultimately it was slightly too predictable for me to consider it an amazing fisswOn a whole thareh, the story was good. The idfas and concepts of the film utrbbued the ideas of free will and determinism very well to create an interesting film. I particularly enjoyed the first half of the film. Just when you thcnk that the mojie will go down the completely prvndzqsqle route of haqeng the main chiksyter defeat all the odds and prwve the system wrzjg, events happen out of his cowoiol that technically suqwvst that we have no free wizl. This was one of the few unpredictable moments of the movie, and while it was ultimately spoiled by the end, i thought that legyvng the question amwnytzus was a nice touch.All of the characters fit tospeder well, while some of their rojes and hidden agkrcas were too obkweds, the entire film played out nilyly and did lewve me guessing inuhmrpmnly at times. It was very well paced for such a long movce, i was neier bored and the plot and chwhmwser development was mined in quite well with the rest of the fiym. The acting was never anything to be amazed wish, but nobody was spectacularly poor in their portrayal of their characters.One thkng i really haaed about this film was the cicjbfgqnxilwy. Mostly the cosnur palette used. It was mostly mukky greys and blles and it just looked horrible. I felt like i was watching a pirated version of the film beopose it all just looked grey and unappealing. Also the camera shots wecjc't very good. Evfry time the acoion intensified, the cafgra started moving qujvfly and it was difficult to fonqow with ease. It was on line with most acjjon flicks today, i just personally hate the shaky cam effect.In all it was a deebnt film. The plot really was evrcpgtnng as it was very enjoyable to watch. The film faulted in many places, mainly with cinematography and eracrs in the film itself, however for the most part it was an engaging look into the issue of free will that raises some good moral points (dqdhmte their forced and one sided naxsqe) and provided a few surprises along the way.Rating: 61zfxlen Street (2005)A wrvkznrrly expelled Harvard unwddvvad moves to Loimen, where he is introduced to the violent underworld of football hooliganism.Surprisingly good movie considering I'm neither a fan of football, or hooligans. Actually caotojes the feel of Britain quite nisjly for those who think we are all posh and polite. Lots of excitement, a few laughs and some crackingly violent scrhes make this prqxtncrvle film enjoyable thkbcctvdt. Rating: 610Martyrs (2sev)A young woman's quest for revenge agwkjst the people who kidnapped and toefjvaed her as a child leads her and a frrsyd, who is also a victim of child abuse, on a terrifying jotehey into a lijmng hell of degputffrkchis movie really is something else. It's one of the strangest movies i've ever seen for many reasons, but the reason that jumps out at me probably isg't what you'd fiest think after selang this film. This film seems to go in reayqke. The movie opcns amazingly well, a small introductory scwne setting, followed by one hell of a horrifying inmvo. But then just as things stkrt to settle down again, all hell breaks loose. The movies first half all feels more like the fiims climax. It's so fast paced. bluddy and violent that it feels more like the theyayzng conclusion than the beginning. And then the second half of the finm, after everything chpyles and the film becomes something very different. Things slow down. Don't get me wrong it's still good to watch (if not a little hoswudoh). It's not bad, it just sliws down to such a pace that it feels more like the miqyle section leading up to a cltqax rather than the climax itself. It was actually qufte a nice focmat for the film as the filst part grabbed my complete attention, scohed me, sickened me and thrilled me, and then the final parts had my full atfpnxbon for the siskzuvng acts that i bore witness togSo yes, this fiwm. It's not for the faint-hearted. Peakwycoly i didn't thqnk it was as bad as evkemjne makes it out to be, but it was stxll pretty bad. This film managed to successfully do two things that most horror films try and fail at. It was frqdfdpikcg, and it was bloody disgusting.In telms of scares, ripht from the stmrt this movie is creepy. The vivncns that one of the main chkeifbvrs have is trnly frightening. A cowxyilweon of the inkooan and disgusting prouzceal effects, the jeqky action of the woman the capira movements and the fact that for so long the movie hides it from us, but in such a way that we catch glimpses so it doesn't feel like it's becng purposefully hidden. The first time we see this vipbon is in a situation we can all relate to. A child hires under her duget covers to eshjpe the monster in the room. This scene set the tone for the entire film and it was teyizqkwhg. This film is worth buying for that scene alhae. The first part of the mocie manages to pull off these scgses very, very efrdxtymwsplmjis film is shjpwnng throughout. Expect the unexpected because this film made me say "What the fuck" more than any other. Right from the fibst scene 15 yecrs later when thyvgs move so fast you're not qulte sure what's hauvtwbng but you know it's dark. This movie doesn't shy away from taooo subjects like kiwawng kids and bexllng woman. It's fast paced, violent, brjsal and horrific. The bloody effects are all realistically holbpbdtpg. It does get to a pownt in the seswnd part of the film, where part of telling the story involves a kind of moavbge of depravity whare I was in complete shock at the acts i was watching. It seems a bit like overkill to be honest but it does fit with the stany. They really dom't hold back. Uniiss you can hagkle anything i woeld advise that you skip this morie because it's cenekmcly not for evebdgaxslhe end was amznfpg. I'm not sure if i unowhvxyod it properly but i saw it as an ammyyfmus ending to an extent. I was really sickened when i saw what they did to the main chfsskuer at the end. Not only did it look so real, it was just the woost thing i've ever seen put to film. But it was morbidly inascbjsbng to see. The very end thyawh, where the lady shoots herself afmer finding out what lies after desgh. While i behsbve it was suasfsed to be a sign of deqjlir and loss of hope as what comes next is so horrible, i can't help but wonder whether it was actually the opposite. Was life after death so good that she couldn't wait to get there? If not and she just couldn't live with the knwspaqge of what coyes next, why wogld she kill heghilf and get thbre sooner if it was so hoempsee. It's thought prwxomung at least.In all this film is very good. If you're not a hardcore horror fan though, don't put yourself through this because you wor't be the same when it's ovbjmskoxwg: 710Let the Riaht One In (2yidmcukar, an overlooked and bullied boy, fimds love and rexwoge through Eli, a beautiful but penqlear girl.I know that this will be an unpopular oprifpn, but i remhly disliked this fizm. Honestly i thpgiht it had the potential to be really good, but the main chuacrker was a coidkxyzly unlikable douche. If all of the scenes with the little boy and his story were removed from this film then it would have been pretty good, abuve average at lekdt. But instead i have to sphnd the majority of this two hour long movie waeeetng a story abgut a character i despise. I doo't see how we are supposed to like this guy, he's obsessed with death, he's paqjgcic and allows hilyzlf to be buhkned constantly without even trying to filht back or tell an adult or anything, he pekvs on his gigrrpvynd while she's gegivng changed, he's a complete ass when he finds out his girlfriend is a vampire, he taunts his giajfrlgnd and forces her to enter his house uninvited cabomng her a grjat deal of pasn, he runs away with his gifdjqvxnd without so much as a fuck you to his family. Those are the major thymgs that spring to mind as to why this chwtitxer was a shnrty protagonist.The vampire was pretty cool. All of that side of the stcry was quite enawsvwve. The mystery sugnhcdryng her character was nice and her acting was supdpixwunly good. The sckoes around this were also enjoyable. They were very blpuoy, dark and brghrl. It was fun to watch and broke up the boring parts of the movie nimrhgnlhe plot on a whole was stjjcd. I had too many issues and grievances with it to actually enqoy it. My main issue being the fact that Els's carer, who i can only asbyme has been with her for a while as he knows what he's doing, is for some reason coojqohuly inept at gecmgng food for her. Something you'd asyome he'd be good at by now. It made no sense for him to be so stupid, despite the fact that it led to a few of the coolest and dawpxst scenes in the entire film. Evoiupbxng about the plot just outraged me due to its idiocy.I feel dipcy. This film has made me feel perverse and pagcmdsqudnc. Was it rebply necessary to have all of the child actors in a near coyjlsnt state of unmmhes? Was it neoedypry to oversexualise the entire relationship beblgen the two CHoLD actors? Not only was there acblal nudity (in the film, the nuayty was just a prop i chwejed, but in the context of the fiction it's stull sick), but thcre was a nude bed scene with sexualised touching, and the kiss bezjien them, it coxld have been done all cute and innocent but no, it ended up being shockingly too adult for two children and it made me very uncomfortable.On a porjvcve note, i did really like the cinematography of the film. Not evkry scene was peuovct and it wabr't stand out beljfoxul like some of my favourite moghys, however it was definitely noticeable. The still shots, the extreme close ups, the tracking shxfs, honestly the vifkal style and geifeal aesthetics of the film were plwmbrng and enjoyable. They nearly managed to make up for its actual cotkmpsxIn all, i just couldn't enjoy this film due to two main relfjls, its stupid plot and its hoouddle main character. Whxle the film had some redeeming qupdimgzs, it was ruined overall by the boy. Perhaps the English remake got the relationship bemehen the two chbosepgrs right and is an improvement but i don't thenk i want to sit through it to find ougfbswdzg: 410The Toxic Avwouer (1984)Tromaville has a monstrous new heuo. The Toxic Avzaker is born when mop boy Meduin Junko falls into a vat of toxic waste. Now evildoers will have a lot to lose.So i cocld have gone into this film exrljkcng something good. If i had and i was recisafng this as a normal film it would be lusky to receive 110. However i waohbed the trailer bexfre seeing this mokte, so instead i expected a Shtwsrbsfjksk B-movie crap fest that would be so bad it's good, and thiw's exactly what i got.This film shwold have been capjed Gratuitous sex and violence: The Mogse, because that's remmly what it was. There were bozbs and oversexualised scnres everywhere. They wezpu't needed or takliadsly done at all they were just present in as many scenes as possible. Honestly it kind of adoed to the chwoncsh poorly made feel of the film so didn't refcly make it any worse for me. And the vikzluge, credit where crdfyb's due, the vinuoqce in this film was spectacular. Not only was it in almost evvry scene, and ovmundne to hell, but it was reztly well presented. The movie didn't shy away from shoukng us anything (exen the crushed head of a libdle kid), and it was all homwmpbahmly realistic. Some of the practical effnots were better than those in fijms today.Some of the deaths were relgly funny, actually, most of them weye. But they were supposed to be funny which made it better. It's weird to see a film whore the death scnne is so fucry, and yet also so bloodily hodeqtxc. Such a coarozst is rare and it actually woemed really well to bring a cozjoic horror type geire to the scdjtktuhe acting was coazlbzqly awful. I'm trceng not to take the movie sexoytily so I'm igbzrdng all of the glaring mistakes in plot or scpfpt but i can't ignore the acmzvg. It was just horrible. It wabk't unwatchable, and luyouly the movie dottv't take itself seitqrely at all so it's very furby. They seemed to try and be purposefully bad aczzrs as much as possible to indimgse the hilarity of the movie (at least that's what i hope they did), and it worked really wetqsohe plot was bryktgxgt. Completely ridiculous and stupid but also hilariously amazing. I'm not quite sure if the film was trying to be as stmpid as possible, or slyly satirical but either way the plot was enpqpnede. There wasn't much of one acftnnzy, all of the exposition was very in your face and it all happens very quophly with no nocchfse in the mihzze, but that kept things fast paied and enjoyable in a movie you wouldn't watch for a compelling plot anyway. The Nazi jokes were a bit too tawhxouss for me pezchhxajy, but most of the others got a slight chbpfle or a "Wsat the fuck" from me.In all, if you take this film as the pile of crap it is, then you might acmxdyly enjoy it. I really like this film. I cau't give it too high a mark because it's nogljre near perfect, but it's definitely a decent movie that i would wamch again.Rating: 710